Yes, it looks correct in LR. I've also checked it in "Preview", but for some strange reason it tells me the image is 72 DPI:
However, in Photoshop it all looks fine:
So why is this?
Furthermore I have some questions about the LR print template I just made:
1) "Image settings"-"zoom to fill": I assume this just zooms in (magnifies) images that don't quite fit 10x15cm, but the strange thing is that with my test photos I cropped them all to 10x15, and yet with this option disabled, all of them show different dimensions (10x14.998 and 10x14.995) and another one actually has a visible blank area on one side (dimensions being 9.998x15 when enabling Guides-Show guides-Dimensions). If I enable "zoom to fill" they all show 10x15. Though almost 10x15, why don't they show that exact dimension? And do I risk some image degradation when enabling this option?
2) Crop marks (Page-Page options-Crop marks) might come in handy for cutting photos where there's no obvious border between them (the same background etc.), but how thick are the actual lines? It looks relatively big on screen, but I have no experience to judge if it'll be visible on paper after having been cut.
3) "Print job-Print to JPEG file": When it comes to "Print sharpening" (low/standard/high) I could see subtle differences in the output files, but what do you recommend for portrait printouts?
Media type (matte/glossy): why is this selectable when in "Print to JPEG" mode and what does it do?
Profile (sRGB/Adobe RGB/Pro photo RGB): does this actually convert all of the selected photos (the 4 photos which are displayed in the print preview) to the profile I choose, or do I need to take care that they all use the same profile before adding them to the print module?
Rendering intent (perceptual/relative: what should I choose here?